SOLUTIONS · WAR & ARMED CONFLICT
Diplomatic negotiation, multilateral working groups, humanitarian operations, peace processes. Situations where dozens of actors hold partial, contradictory, and evolving views of the same facts — and the cost of misreading is paid by the people least responsible for the confusion.
TACITUS does not take a side. We are not peace infrastructure. We are legibility infrastructure — the map every party gets to look at.
The vocabulary changes with the stakes. The structure does not.
| Primitive | In this domain |
|---|---|
| Actor | State, faction, mediator, guarantor, civilian population |
| Claim | "The ceasefire was violated on 3 February." |
| Interest | Territorial integrity. Autonomy. Recognition. |
| Commitment | Signed ceasefire, withdrawal commitment, mandate text |
| Leverage | Territory, recognition, economic flows, alliance capacity |
Diplomatic
Three rounds of bilateral talks, six draft agreements, two contested annexes — structured per commitment, per actor, per session.
Multilateral
A working group across six member states, each with a different reading of the preceding resolution — aligned to one graph.
Humanitarian
Hundreds of field reports across three provinces, compressed into a queryable actor-event-commitment graph, with provenance to every report.
If you run or support complex multi-party processes, we want to know what the map is missing.