Loading...
Loading...
Solutions
TACITUS brings the same rigor to conflict data that financial systems bring to transactions. One architecture, infinite applications. Purpose-built to increase accuracy for mediators, lawyers, HR professionals, diplomats, and boards.
Structured, not summarized
Knowledge graphs, not LLM prose
Provenance on every claim
Every assertion is traceable to source
Temporal awareness built-in
DAG-preserved event ordering
Zero hallucination on keyed facts
Deterministic graph layer
Grievance processes are slow, opaque, and legally risky. TACITUS structures workplace disputes into machine-legible timelines — with actors, claims, and evidence in a provenance-tracked graph.
Scenario
A Fortune 500 HR team faced a multi-department harassment complaint spanning 18 months, involving 12 employees and 400+ Slack messages. TACITUS structured the full timeline in hours — surfacing escalation patterns, actor relationships, and evidence chains that took investigators weeks to piece together manually.
How TACITUS helps
Turn sprawling HR investigations into structured, queryable conflict graphs — with full provenance for legal defensibility.
Discovery is expensive. Depositions generate noise. TACITUS extracts structured claim-evidence networks from legal documents, making litigation support faster and more defensible.
Scenario
An AM100 law firm managing a commercial arbitration with 50,000 documents used TACITUS to map claim-evidence relationships across 8 years of correspondence. The graph revealed a key contractual inconsistency no human reviewer had flagged.
How TACITUS helps
Convert document-heavy disputes into structured knowledge graphs with auditable claim-evidence bindings.
Commercial disputes often hinge on obligation tracking across years of correspondence. TACITUS maps every commitment, breach, and position shift — so nothing gets missed.
Scenario
In a $200M supply chain dispute, TACITUS reconstructed 4 years of contract amendments, verbal commitments, and email threads into a single temporal graph — identifying 3 RedLine violations that preceded the formal breach.
How TACITUS helps
Map every obligation, breach, and position shift across years of commercial correspondence.
Governance disputes are complex actor networks with hidden interests and formal constraints. TACITUS surfaces the structure of board-level disagreements before they become public crises.
Scenario
A PE-backed company facing a CEO removal dispute used TACITUS to map board member positions, coalitions, and formal constraints — enabling the Chairman to prepare a principled resolution strategy before the decisive meeting.
How TACITUS helps
Give boards the structural intelligence to navigate governance disputes with clarity and documented reasoning.
Diplomatic conflicts involve multi-party position tracking, narrative competition, and long temporal arcs. TACITUS was designed from the ground up by a UN practitioner who produced 600+ intelligence products for the Security Council.
Scenario
A diplomatic mission managing a protracted ceasefire process used the TACITUS framework to track 18 months of position shifts, commitment violations, and mediation attempts — giving negotiators a structured brief before each session.
How TACITUS helps
Ground diplomatic AI reasoning in structured, provenance-tracked conflict graphs — not LLM-generated summaries.
Family disputes involve deep relationship histories, competing narratives, and emotionally charged claims. TACITUS brings structure without judgment — surfacing interests beneath positions.
Scenario
A family mediation involving a contested estate across three generations and two jurisdictions used Conflict Compass to surface underlying interests beyond stated positions — enabling a settlement that satisfied all parties without litigation.
How TACITUS helps
Surface the interests hidden beneath contested family positions — with full privacy controls and mediator-grade structure.
Also serving
Every vertical is powered by the same TACITUS neurosymbolic conflict engine — the same 8-primitive Conflict Grammar, the same typed knowledge graph, the same provenance and temporal logic. One architecture, every domain.
Whether you're navigating an HR dispute or a diplomatic process, the architecture is the same.