Skip to content

Under active development

Development status →
TACITUS
Section pages

The Reference Capsule

Inspect a compiled context package.

Download a capsule compiled with the DIALECTICA CLI. Inspect the source-linked records, time and review decisions in this synthetic reference. The viewer runs locally in your browser; the artifact does not establish PRAXIS graph interchange.

Reference capsule · synthetic scenario, clearly labeled · compiled 2026-06-08 with dialectica-cli · minimal canonical fixture — the structure is the point. Live-updating capsules and change memos remain a development goal.

Start with a claim, follow its source receipt, then inspect its review decision. These are the kinds of records a person or a task-bound agent would need to check an assessment. This downloadable fixture demonstrates the format; it does not run a PRAXIS agent or establish end-to-end integration.

Explore the proposed agent workflow in PRAXIS
loading capsule…

Printable worked example

Repetition, competing claims and a correction

manually-authored synthetic teaching example; not DIALECTICA-compiled or PRAXIS-generated. This second example complements the minimal compiled fixture; it does not claim the compiler or PRAXIS produced these records.

The question

Is the Northbridge crossing closed to all traffic?

  1. S1 · 2026-09-01T09:10:00Z
    A driver reports that the Northbridge crossing is closed. The authority has not commented.
  2. S2 · 2026-09-01T09:35:00Z
    Northbridge crossing closed, according to the local dispatch.
  3. S3 · 2026-09-01T12:10:00Z
    Freight inspections are delayed. Passenger lanes remain open as of noon.

Review decision

Keep original claims and revise the blanket closure wording.

An initial closure report was repeated without a new observation. A later authority statement reports freight delays and open passenger lanes. Current independent conditions remain unconfirmed.

Still open: Are the reported passenger conditions independently confirmed?

Download the reviewed example (JSON)

CC BY 4.0 for this newly authored teaching example: attribute TACITUS and identify adaptations. License terms. The minimal compiled ZIP retains its own repository-specific terms; redistribution permission has not been independently confirmed here.

Nine proposed responsibilities, eight fixture layers

The proposed model names evidence, claims, situation/graph, temporal, ontology, reasoning, memory, governance and runtime. This v3 fixture contains eight corresponding layers: it has no separate memory layer. Identity and build metadata still exist in the manifest, but that does not demonstrate a complete revision-history implementation.

Same responsibility, different label
The capsule overview calls the situation layer “Graph”; the fixture calls it “situation”.
Memory absent as a separate layer
The minimal fixture has no memory directory or full change-history example. Do not infer it from the manifest timestamp.
Other eight responsibilities
Evidence, claims, situation, temporal, ontology, reasoning, governance and runtime are listed in the fixture manifest. Presence does not establish factual accuracy or a deployed agent.

Print this page for a human-readable companion. Retain the synthetic status and unresolved questions when sharing it.

Download

Situation capsule bundle (.zip)

Historical fixture terms: inspect and download the examples here, but ask before redistribution where no explicit asset license is stated. Rights fields inside a fixture describe its fictional scenario; they are not a redistribution license. The new competing-claims example below is CC BY 4.0.

sha256:53664e745a3a38d44eed7defc5e8f341004c9c94a9c6665c06fc82d8546ff34c

One example file per capsule type

Integrity envelope (Merkle root, Ed25519 signing, capsule verify) is on the spec roadmap — ADR-009. Today you get the bundle’s SHA-256 above; the seal in the viewer is drawn deterministically from it.

How this was built

Real output from the open-source CLI — captured, not animated:

$ dialectica validate ./conflict-situation-capsule
validation: PASS · spec 3.0 · 8 layers present
claims: sourced 1/1 · review ledger: consistent

$ dialectica inspect ./conflict-situation-capsule
cap_conflict_situation_fixture_v3 · situation · spec 3.0
layers: evidence claims situation temporal ontology reasoning governance runtime

$ dialectica archive ./conflict-situation-capsule --out capsule.zip
wrote archive (mimetype-first zip)
Explore the capsule developer guide →

Want capsules built from your desk’s own documents?

Tell us which question your team needs to answer and what source material is available. We can discuss a scoped evaluation, review responsibilities, and what would count as a useful result. Timing, data handling, and export requirements need to be agreed.

Discuss an evaluation
Search and terminologyMachine-readable index