Loading TACITUS
Loading TACITUS
Why context
What separates an expert team from a smart generalist is not intelligence — it is context: the sources they trust and why, the history of the file, the way their best people sequence a problem, the house rules for what good output looks like. Almost none of it is written down in a form a machine can use.
That is the actual reason frontier models underperform in serious knowledge work. The models are capable; they are simply uninformed in the precise, structured way that matters — and unverifiable in the way institutions require. Fix the context, carry it with receipts, and the same model becomes a colleague you can check.
Without structured context
A model asked for an options memo invents a coherent-sounding position because it cannot know the minister’s standing commitments, the file’s history, or which earlier assessment was superseded and why.
With capsules attached
A User capsule carries the mandate and standing positions; a Situation capsule carries the file — claims with trust tiers, both clocks, the superseded chain. The memo starts from the desk’s actual state of knowledge, and every line can be traced back to it.
Without structured context
Legal, risk, regulatory, investigations, journalism — anywhere the first question is “source?”. Generic AI answers fluently and unverifiably, so the expensive expert re-does the work to check it, and the time saved is lost.
With capsules attached
When the context itself carries receipts, checking becomes cheap. The reviewer audits the capsule once; every output built on it inherits the audit. Verification stops being a per-document tax.
Without structured context
Conflict is the stress test: contested claims, deliberate misinformation, actors whose statements are moves. A model with no structure treats every assertion as comparable text — and confidently misreads who committed what, when, to whom.
With capsules attached
The capsule types the disagreement itself: claims marked disputed must surface as disputed; commitments are tracked against behavior; episodes carry causal links. The model argues from the structure of the conflict, not over it.
Without structured context
Timing and framing are the substance. A model that conflates when something happened with when it became known — or that ignores how an audience has heard a phrase before — produces text that is fluent and diplomatically wrong.
With capsules attached
Two clocks keep the timeline honest; narrative primitives track how each audience frames events; output contracts carry the house discipline — register, citation form, what must never be implied. The draft arrives already inside the tradition.
Every experienced professional runs on structured processes they could not fully write down if you asked — Polanyi’s old observation that we know more than we can tell. The knowledge is real, earned, and organization-critical. It is also the first thing lost to retirement, turnover, and reorganization.
Capsules make that knowledge a first-class object. Not as prose memoirs — as typed, reviewed, attributable structure: devices, heuristics, traps, sequences, contracts. Three concrete cases:
The HR function, 2015–2020
The tacit structure, surfaced by elicitation
As a capsule
Five years of resolved cases plus an elicitation interview become a Tool capsule: the triage heuristics, the interview sequence, the phrasing rules, the documented traps. A new caseworker — or an AI drafting a first assessment — works inside that judgment instead of rediscovering it case by painful case.
The mediator
The tacit structure, surfaced by elicitation
As a capsule
Their transcripts and a structured interview yield devices — named, reviewed, attributed. When a team prepares a session with that Tool capsule attached, the draft strategy shows in its margin which of the mediator’s heuristics shaped each judgment. The reasoning is inheritable; the credit is preserved.
The diplomat’s speechwriter
The tacit structure, surfaced by elicitation
As a capsule
Exemplar speeches plus a contract become an Output capsule: structure, register, forbidden framings, citation style. Any drafting model attached to it produces text inside the voice — and a reviewer can check the contract was honored, clause by clause.
Crucially, none of this is blank-page authoring — the classic failure of 1980s expert systems. Capsules precipitate out of work the expert already does: resolved cases, transcripts, exemplar documents, plus a structured interview that asks for devices, not anecdotes. The expert reviews everything before it carries their name.
Models will keep improving; your context is what they will never have unless you capture it. And in institutions, captured context is only useful if it can be checked — which is why every capsule carries receipts, trust tiers, two clocks, and a named reviewer.