Application study · under active development
Keep judgment intact when information is contested.
Claims can arrive faster than a team can establish their origin, timing, and evidential strength. PRAXIS brings source documents and saved context into one analytical workspace. Our proposed information-resilience workflow extends that foundation to comparing contested narratives and producing a brief a reviewer can inspect.
A proposed evidence-to-brief workflow
01Scope the question
Define the decision, time window, source permissions, and uncertainties. Begin with public or approved documents rather than unrestricted collection.
02Build the situation capsule
Preserve statements, publication dates, actors, channels, sources, and alternative interpretations. Mark attribution as assessed, disputed, or unknown; do not infer coordination from similarity alone.
03Assign bounded analytical work
The intended agents retrieve evidence, compare accounts, and challenge a draft. Each should return source receipts and a saved artifact. Autonomous completion is still being validated.
04Review the brief
An analyst checks the citations and separates observation from inference. Record disagreements and missing evidence before approving a version.
05Carry the context forward
The next shift should receive the evidence trail and reasoning, not only a conclusion. Cross-workspace portability is a development target, with access and reference preservation still needing work.
Evaluate judgment, not just fluency.
A useful pilot should measure citation accuracy, source diversity, unsupported attribution, temporal errors, and whether a second analyst can reconstruct the assessment. Speed matters only alongside these checks.
The intended application is defensive analysis, education, and institutional resilience. We are not presenting a capability for targeted persuasion, automated influence campaigns, or military targeting. Human authority and source access remain explicit.
Source publications
Selected background reading on the analytical problem. These publications are citations, not evidence of a TACITUS affiliation or product validation.
- NATO ACT — Cognitive Warfare. Background on manipulation, decision-making, and resilience.
- U.S. Army — Army publishes first doctrinal manual dedicated to information (2023). Publication context for ADP 3-13 and informational effects.
- EEAS — Fourth FIMI Threat Report (2026). Documented information-manipulation cases and source relationships.
Bring a question you need to defend.
Try the document-and-chat workflow in PRAXIS, or bring a non-sensitive source set to discuss a team pilot.